Queen - In Concert

During the latter portion of their career, Queen had a reputation as being one of the most exciting and accomplished live bands around. But to what extent what this true, and how did they develop and progress during that period? 

There is plenty of evidence around on which to base our judgements, in the form of concert footage and sound recordings, and recollections from those who were there in person. Some of my own opinions on this subject may not necessarily correspond with those of the majority of Queen fans!

From what I have seen, heard and read, Queen truly started to blossom as a live band around 1977. Prior to that, they appeared slightly hesitant and restrained. However, in '77 the band began to flourish, learning how to project themselves and their music, and how to develop a rapport with the audience. Anybody who has seen footage of the Earls Court concerts of this period will know what I mean. From then on, Queen seemed to possess a whole new aura of cohesion and dynamism.

This new focus and efficiency was honed in the "white heat" of the gruelling and challenging American tours of the time. As Queen's appeal broadened, they had to develop new skills in order to impress new, more discerning and demanding audiences. Much of the enhanced energy was refracted through the person of Freddie Mercury, whose powers of showmanship developed markedly around this time.

As the 1970s drew to a close, Queen continued to thrive, and it seemed like a good time to release a live album. Live Killers, recorded on the 1979 European tour and released later that year, is an adequate document, but perhaps does not fully capture the excitement of Queen's performances of that era.  Whilst there are some fine moments, the intensity and quality does seem a touch uneven, possibly reflecting the stage of the tour at which the recordings were made, and the effects of an arduous schedule.

When I first heard Live Killers, I was very enthusiastic, but as the years have passed, and as more concert material from the 1977-82 period has surfaced, its lustre has diminished.  The "acoustic" section of the album, and the performances of Now I'm Here and Keep Yourself Alive are superb, but in other parts the group sounds slightly listless, almost as if they were going through the motions.

My own view is that Queen peaked as a live act in 1981/82. It is true that the set list was less interesting and diverse than in previous years, but several strands came together to make the band a formidable force in the early 1980s. Freddie's voice had reached new heights of power, flexibility and versatility. Years of touring had schooled them in the art of performance and showmanship, instilling a tightness and vigour.  By now they were more acutely aware of what worked, and what didn't. The diverse musical influences of the band members also added to this appealing mixture.

Fortunately, there is plenty of visual and audio evidence of just how powerful Queen were live around that time. The footage from Montreal 1981 and Milton Keynes 1982, for example. The latter especially could be shown to aspiring bands as a tutorial on how to "work a crowd". I myself was fortunate enough to witness the 1982 version of Queen, at Elland Road in Leeds. As a youngster, I was absolutely transfixed.

Is it significant that as Queen's live shows reached new heights of excellence, their albums became less ambitious, and arguably less substantial?  Some of this may be coincidence, but the albums in the late 70s and early 80s had a more "stripped down" feel, and the songs being recorded were therefore easier to reproduce on stage than some of the elaborate earlier efforts. Also, the move towards a less complex sound may have enabled Queen to imbue their older songs with a new energy and immediacy in the concert setting. Another factor may have been that as Queen expended less time and emotional energy on the studio, more was left over to devote to honing their stagecraft...

Following the dizzy heights of the early 1980s, Queen's powers began to wane, the triumphant Live Aid appearance notwithstanding . Several things may have contributed to this. A fall-off in energy levels was perhaps inevitable. The band members became involved in side projects, and this may have prompted a reduction in focus. Indeed, it is known that there were major tensions within the group around 1984/85. Added to all this was a noticeable decline in Freddie's overall vocal powers on stage.

I know that many Queen fans assert that 1986 was the zenith of their touring career, but this is not something that I readily concur with. Admittedly, a lot of this comes down to personal taste.  However, I think that some people are swayed by sentiment in this case, and confuse what the tour represented with the substance of the performances. The venues were larger than any which Queen had previously played in Europe, but the recordings which I have heard reveal a slightly soulless sound, with some of the intimacy and technical punch of previous tours sacrificed for sheer spectacle and scale.  Having said all this, Queen's shows were still emotionally affecting, and the 1986 tour certainly scored high on the "goosebumps" scale!

It is fascinating to speculate how matters would have evolved later in the 1980s, but alas we will never know....

All fans will have their own views on when Queen were at their best as a live band.  My own ideal situation, for what it's worth, would have been the 1982 version of the band playing the 1977 set-list at Wembley Stadium.  That would have covered all the bases!